<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why the PS3 (and I) got its dates wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jon-reed.co.uk/2010/03/02/why-the-ps3-got-its-dates-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jon-reed.co.uk/2010/03/02/why-the-ps3-got-its-dates-wrong/</link>
	<description>The ramblings of a Web Developer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:13:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dilapper</title>
		<link>http://www.jon-reed.co.uk/2010/03/02/why-the-ps3-got-its-dates-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>dilapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jon-reed.co.uk/?p=119#comment-27</guid>
		<description>So, using this ISO year, would you have fallen foul of the same bug they had, where (I believe) it thought 2010 was a leap year?

Because all I could work out from that stackOverflow article was that the first week of 2010 is actually the 53rd week of the ISO-year 2009. That all makes sense, but left me wondering why it would cause problems now (or rather, yesterday).

Does that explain why 01/03/2010 caused such a problem?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, using this ISO year, would you have fallen foul of the same bug they had, where (I believe) it thought 2010 was a leap year?</p>
<p>Because all I could work out from that stackOverflow article was that the first week of 2010 is actually the 53rd week of the ISO-year 2009. That all makes sense, but left me wondering why it would cause problems now (or rather, yesterday).</p>
<p>Does that explain why 01/03/2010 caused such a problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
